Smirnoff criticised over naked man ad

LONDON - Smirnoff has paid the price for its risque poster ad featuring a naked man sliding down a banister.

Guinness United Distillers & Vintners, which owns the Smirnoff brand, was criticised by the advertising watchdog, the Advertising Standards Authority, which said the ad was likely to cause serious or widespread offence.



In the the ad, created by J Walter Thompson, a man slides down a banister, wearing nothing more than an ecstatic grin, with the strapline stating, "...If Smirnoff made pain killers".



The dispute hinged around the alleged visibility of the man's penis. While Guinness argued that the man in the ad was wearing flesh-coloured underwear in the poster, complainants, 44 of whom come from Birmingham, believed his penis was visible.



The ASA upheld the complaint, ruling that although it understood that the man was, in fact, wearing underwear, it considered that most members of the public would believe the man's penis was visible.



The watchdog also challenged the poster's likelihood to encourage the public to consume excessive amounts of alcohol. It ruled that because the poster depicted drunken activity, it could encourage immoderate drinking. It told the advertiser not to use the approach again.




If you have an opinion on this or any other issue raised on Brand Republic, join the debate in the .



Jennifer Whitehead, recommends

Advertising Standards Authority

Read more

You have

[DAYS_LEFT] Days left

of your free trial

Subscribe now

Get a team licence 

 Give your teams unrestricted access to in-depth editorial analysis, breaking news and premium reports with a bespoke subscription to ±±¾©Èü³µpk10.

Find out more

Market Reports

Get unprecedented new-business intelligence with access to ±±¾©Èü³µpk10’s new Market Reports.

Find out more

Looking for a new job?

Get the latest creative jobs in advertising, media, marketing and digital delivered directly to your inbox each day.

Create an Alert Now