FSA defends report on organic food's nutritional value

LONDON - The Food Standards Agency has defended a report it published last month that concluded there is little, if any, nutritional difference between organically and conventionally produced foods.

FSA defends report on organic food's nutritional value

The Soil Association complained that the FSA had failed to acknowledge the effect of pesticides and studies that showed compounds in organic crops to be more nutritionally desirable.

FSA chief executive Tim Smith responded that the use of pesticides ‘does not pose an unacceptable risk to human health and helps to ensure a plentiful supply of food all year round', and was therefore excluded from the report. He also added that the message to be drawn from the report ‘is not that people should avoid organic food, but that they should eat a healthy balanced diet'.

However, the FSA's conclusions have been interpreted by some observers as likely to damage the organic market.

See next week's Marketing (12 August) for an analysis of the organic food sector.

 

Market Reports

Get unprecedented new-business intelligence with access to ±±¾©Èü³µpk10’s new Advertising Intelligence Market Reports.

Find out more

Enjoying ±±¾©Èü³µpk10’s content?

 Get unlimited access to ±±¾©Èü³µpk10’s premium content for your whole company with a corporate licence.

Upgrade access

Looking for a new job?

Get the latest creative jobs in advertising, media, marketing and digital delivered directly to your inbox each day.

Create an alert now

Partner content