Advertisers, stop trying to make women 'confident'
A view from Sue Higgs

Advertisers, stop trying to make women 'confident'

So many brands want to 'empower' women and give them confidence, but this is its own form of stereotypical advertising, Dentsumcgarrybowen's joint ECD says.

So far in 2021, women rule. From Kamala Harris and Amanda Gorman to Michaela Coel and Professor Sarah Gilbert, women have been busy setting the political, cultural and vaccination agenda with a confidence built on the experiences, drive and opportunities that have brought them this far.聽

We can be pretty sure that their mindset has very little (in fact nothing) to do with their choice of deodorant or shampoo, yet still many beauty advertisers persist in peddling the idea that, for women at least, confidence comes in a can.聽

Women have been told for many years how to look 鈥 mostly beautiful to attract men 鈥撀燽ut now it seems sexism is sneaking in again, and the naughty advertisers are starting to tell women how they should feel.

As an industry, we have a duty of care to stop this before we bombard women with 鈥渉ow to feel鈥 messages. So many brands want to 鈥渆mpower鈥 women and give them confidence: whether it鈥檚 shampoo, deodorant, female grooming or razors, 99% of the briefs I have seen say that the purpose of the product is to make women more 鈥渃onfident鈥.聽

Not 鈥渟exy鈥 or 鈥渟trong,鈥 but 鈥渃onfident鈥. Men, meanwhile, will be given a rationale for buying a brand, a concrete reason to spray their pits in "brand bloke". It might last two-and-a-half times longer, or it might just make you more manly or more woke, but your confidence as a man is a given, while the assumption is that a woman鈥檚 confidence is so closely tied to her physical appearance that one purchase or one application will do it.聽聽

Of course, there are brands, such as Bodyform and Sport England, that are breaking taboos, but there are too many more that aren鈥檛. I have been in far too many briefings where the 鈥淐鈥 word has been bandied around and I am sat there thinking, 鈥淚 don鈥檛 get it.鈥 Maybe it鈥檚 just me? Maybe I鈥檓 not very good at being a woman? Maybe I鈥檓 un-empowerable?聽

But the other way of looking at this is that it鈥檚 total bullshit, and that 鈥 even at the briefing stage 鈥 stereotypes are still being peddled. Look at the recent government 鈥淪tay at home鈥 ad, which revealed a catalogue of unmitigated misogynist beliefs that a woman鈥檚 place is in the home, probably because she鈥檚 not bought herself the confidence to venture out into the world.聽

I鈥檝e never sat in a briefing in which a brand is claiming to give a man more confidence.聽

Casting is often accused of playing into stereotypes, but I put it to you that it usually starts earlier, with a certain type of brief.聽

We need to view women as the multidimensional beings that they are. How about some rationale, some facts? I鈥檓 confident our brains can take it. I can鈥檛 be alone in looking beyond my mascara in search of self-esteem, or delving deeper than my moisturiser in a bid for confidence-boosting authenticity. I don鈥檛 want to be empowered, and I don鈥檛 need a brand to tell me that it鈥檚 OK to feel OK about my body, even though it鈥檚 not 鈥減erfect鈥.聽

For anyone who binged Schitt鈥檚 Creek on Netflix (and if you haven鈥檛, may I implore you to), the genius was in the writers鈥 portrayal of the gay characters not as a stereotype or a 鈥減roblem鈥 that needed solving, but simply as people living the normal ups and downs experienced by all the characters in the series.聽

A brief that includes 鈥渃onfidence鈥 or any other stereotypical bullshit should set alarm bells ringing, and we all need to summon the confidence to question it. If we don鈥檛, we鈥檒l continue to see sexist work like the government was trying to peddle at us, and we will be up shit鈥檚 creek as an industry.聽

Sue Higgs is joint executive creative director at Dentsumcgarrybowen

Topics