The recent bidding war for the licences to run third-generation (3G)
mobile phone networks in the UK may have left the Treasury #22bn richer,
but it has left the winners wondering whether they can deliver what they
promised. As the bidding went far higher than anyone expected, analysts
are now saying that the winners may have to rip up their business plans
and start again.
For content and e-commerce providers, the broadband 3G networks will offer
a new platform to deliver a range of life-enhancing services to their
users, enabling them to infiltrate all areas of their customers’ lives at
work, at play as well as via everyday activities such as paying a gas
bill. The networks will provide access to a huge customer base, and are
desperate to work with the best providers in order to retain that user
base.
”The bottom line is that each operator has to find a way of generating
traffic,” says Stephen Warburton, marketing director for the technology,
communications and entertainment practice at Ernst & Young. Warburton
estimates that expenditure per user will have to increase five-fold to pay
for the licences alone. Networks are already searching for applications
and content, despite the fact that full 3G services will not be available
before 2002.
One reason for this is that, before full 3G, the existing networks will
all upgrade their equipment to a new standard - sometimes known as 2.5G -
called General Packet Radio Service (GPRS). Networks and developers are
likely to use GPRS as a testbed. It will allow some bandwidth-heavy
3G-type applications; they will just not be ”as fast or as pretty”, as one
executive put it, as full 3G applications. GPRS will, for example, allow
users to record and send video stills on phones equipped with cameras.
This postcard mail facility is expected to be popular, with friends
sending each other snaps of what they are up to when they are out and
about.
It is estimated that upgrading to GPRS will cost the networks between
#1.5bn and #2.5 bn. The first network to take the plunge is BT Cellnet,
which is expected to go live with GPRS in the early summer. Orange will be
launching its 3G-type services, such as the Orange Videophone, later this
year, which will allow full-colour video-conferencing at 12 frames per
second, along with high-speed internet access.
After GPRS has been rolled out in the next 12-18 months, full 3G will
begin to be offered - probably islands within GPRS in major cities and
built up areas at first. Full 3G will support real-time video applications
more effectively than GPRS.
By the time we get to full 3G, each network is likely to have set up its
own mobile internet portal, through which content and applications are
accessed, much like BT’s Genie. ”This primary interface may be an area of
differentiation for networks, but there is a debate about how sticky
portals can be,” says Paul Long, BT Cellnet’s general manager of 3G
marketing. ”We think it will be about personalising the information in a
snazzy way and making it accessible. It is a question of how attractive
and easy to navigate it is, as each portal will access much the same
content.”
The best applications are likely to run on each of the five networks
eventually, but initially the five 3G networks will be distinguished to
some extent by the mix of exclusive and non-exclusive applications they
offer, and how they are packaged. Networks will not have time to prepare
as comprehensive a service as they would like set up, nor indeed will be
it be clear at the outset what the market wants.
Although there will be a high degree of portability for applications
across networks, developers seeking to write applications and provide
content for 3G are initially likely to find themselves working with one or
another of the networks.
”The tools of this trade are very similar,” says Ian Germer, product
director for Vodafone Multimedia. ”We have common standards, so what
differentiates you is the ability to draw different applications providers
to you.”
Each network might seek to flavour its offering by positioning its
services as enhancing an individual’s life in a different way. Orange, for
example, says: ”The intention of Orange is to become a life-management
services provider. This will see Orange providing health, travel, music,
games, information and home management services, all using the Orange
network.” However, it is keeping its cards close to its chest with regard
to the types of commercial ventures it will be pursuing. An Orange
spokesperson says: ”We’re not in a position to give names. We are working
hard at developing commercial relationships across a wide range of
companies across multiple industry segments.”
Newcomers to the UK, Canadian company Telesystem International Wireless
(TIW) and Hong Kong’s Hutchison Whampoa paid #4.3bn for the largest
allocation of spectrum and are expected to invest another #3bn in building
a network.
TIW already has mobile operations in Canada, Brazil, Romania and the Czech
Republic, and has a majority shareholding in Dolphin Telecom in the
UK.
TIW/HW has yet to decide its strategy for the UK licence, but one
possibility is that the Dolphin network of 650 client sites might be
adapted for 3G.
”3G will be more of a corporate market at first, instead of one involving
ordinary people browsing the internet,” says a spokesperson.
”Traditionally, business users are the early adopters of technology like
this, so we are looking at the opportunity in that segment.”
Among the first decisions to be made is at what stage to join the
market.
This might involve building a network based on GPRS, which has around five
times as much bandwidth as existing networks, and is being used by the
four existing operators as a stepping stone to 3G. The alternative would
be to delay entry until a full 3G network can be built.
The company is still at the early stages of its plans and is working on
the request for proposals from companies seeking to provide equipment to
build its network. It says its thinking will be clearer when that decision
has been made around September and will then start working with
application developers.
Of the four existing networks that will upgrade for 3G, Vodafone is the
odd one out. For, while the other three have licences to use 25MHz of the
spectrum, Vodafone has a licence for 30MHz and has paid #1.9bn more for
the privilege. This extra range, the company says, means it will be best
placed to operate applications that require a high bandwidth, such as
those using a lot of video. This could suggest a corporate target
market.
For example, an application might be developed to allow an engineer in the
field to dial in to see a video of how to mend an unfamiliar piece of
equipment.
Tim Harrabin, strategy director of Vodafone Airtouch, describes the extra
spectrum as ”very significant”. He says: ”We see a big future for
high-bandwidth services, especially those that use video. We will be seen
as the leading network for high bandwidth services. We enjoy a high market
share for corporate customers - over 50 per cent of the market - and this
is a very important area for applications developers. We need developers
to focus on specific areas like utilities, transport, or retail, for
example.”
The company says the extra capacity will allow it to upgrade its existing
network more quickly and get to market at an early date. For applications
writers and content providers, this might offer the chance to get an early
return on investment.
In terms of applications, the networks are looking for applications in
three areas - consumer, business (small to medium-sized) and corporate -
and are all trying to work out, as BT’s Long puts it, ”what killer
applications there will be”.
Services for consumers will include: sophisticated telephony and
information services, including internet, intranet, travel, games,
shopping and entertainment; multimedia services, including the sending and
receiving of text, audio and full-motion colour video; and e-commerce
services, such as electronic money schemes for payment and accessing
accounts.
Handset video is an important new development (likely to arrive before 3G
with GPRS) that will, for example, allow vendors to send pictures of an
item for sale to a potential buyer. Others applications might allow users
to dial in when they are away to check that their home is safe, or see who
is at their front door.
The point will be to make the services as relevant as possible to
individual customers. ”It will be about delivering services to customers
that are directly related to them as individuals rather than market
segments they might fall into,” says Germer.
Another possibility is location-based services, as the networks will use
triangulation (the position of the handset relative to the nearest three
transmitters) to assess location with an accuracy of 100-150 metres.
If, as it may be, Global Positioning Satellite data is involved, this
could become accurate to 10-20 metres.
”You could have ’let people know where I am’ type services,” says Jay Saw,
One2One’s business strategy manager. ”You might opt in to some kind of
dating services, or you might use the function to meet people in crowded
places.”
In the business segment, many of the applications will be about extending
the workplace into the field or the home. Video-based applications
specific to a line of work - for example allowing doctors to see an injury
and advise on initial treatment remotely - are likely to be
significant.
Video-conferencing is another obvious application. But most of the
excitement will be around applications that are not just existing ones
ported to mobiles from other devices like home PCs or video cameras, but
wholly new ideas. Long says: ”We are looking for applications that excite
us. There will be a race to develop the killer applications, if there are
any. It is a question of working out opportunities not covered by the
current networks. For example, tracking may be possible with cars or
pets.”
Saw agrees: ”At the moment, video is one of the few applications that
needs the 144 megabyte/second of data transmission that will be available,
but as soon as you have extra capacity or processing speed you find
applications will come along that can use it - things we can not imagine
today.
”The whole data thing has not been developed, as people do not understand
what they can do yet,” says BT’s Long. ”Also the whole area of the
cashless society - paying vending machines and other similar things with
your phones - is another new area that will take some time for developers
to get to grips with.”
One wholly new opportunity is one arising for applications around
advertising.
Commercial messages of some sort are likely to feature on all networks,
but it will be more like sponsorship than advertising. The thinking is
that the best applications will not just be saying ”buy this”, but will be
more about provision of information that customers will appreciate. The 3G
technology allows fantastic targeting to individuals about whom a lot is
known.
”A network might send a message saying: ’We know you are interested in a
certain thing. Before you make the next call, listen to an offer and we
will pay for that call for you’,” suggests Germer. ”Or information could
appear as text saying: ’Do you want the latest news on Yamaha
bikes?’.”
Services will, of course, be fully location-dependent, allowing companies
to target specific places with offers or services. The crucial thing for
these applications is that the mechanism should suit the customer’s needs
at the time. That way everyone wins: the advertiser gets an audience that
is interested in its product, the customer gets a useful service.
The way advertising deals are structured is still being hammered out, as
are arrangements surrounding access to content and applications. Issues
such as who is responsible for selling the ad space - the content provider
or the network - and how consumers will be charged for 3G phone use are
also unresolved. Charges could, for example, be based around a flat
monthly fee, or depend on the amount of bandwidth used.
Who will come out on top in all of this is anyone’s guess. Ernst & Young’s
Warburton says: ”It is far too early to say which of the networks is best
placed. Everyone has taken a gamble - this is far more money than anyone
expected to pay. There is a big potential market, but a lot of money has
been invested.”
A POTTED HISTORY OF THE MOBILE NETWORK PLAYERS
ONE 2 ONE
Current market share* 18.5%
Network coverage At least 98%
Sum paid #4bn
Spectrum allocation 25MHz
GPRS coverage starts autumn 2000
One 2 One came into the mobile market with the second - generation GSM
networks.
The offer of free off-peak calls within the M25 area led to rapid
growth.
As one of the two later additions to the market, the current phones work
at 1,800MHz, which means the company needs more transmitters in its
network.
The company was bought last autumn by Deutsche Telekom.
ORANGE
Current market share* 22%
Network coverage 99%
Sum paid #4bn
Spectrum allocation 25MHz
GPRS coverage starts from the end of this year
Orange was last of the four networks to launch, joining the party in
April1994, in the second-generation network phase. The company was owned
by Hong Kong-based group Hutchison Whampoa, but was bought by Mannesmann
before the German firm was acquired by Vodafone Airtouch. As part of that
deal, Orange had to be sold and France Telecom acquired the company in
May.
VODAFONE
Current market share* 32.3%
Network coverage 99%
Sum paid #5.9bn
Spectrum allocation 30MHz
GPRS coverage starts from the end of this year
Vodafone is the UK subsidiary of Vodafone Airtouch, the global group which
operates in 25 countries . Publicly-owned Vodafone has the biggest current
market share, having been one of the two mobile operators in at the
beginning of first-generation mobiles.
BT CELLNET
Current market share* 27.3%
Network coverage 99%
Sum paid #4bn
Spectrum allocation 25MHz
GPRS coverage starts July 2000
BT Cellnet was started as a joint venture between BT and the delivery
service Securicor in 1984, pioneering the UK mobile market alongside
Vodafone.
After changes to the rules which regulated it, BT took over the whole
company. In the 3G market, it faces the prospect of its home market being
eroded by its two European rivals, FT (Orange) and DT (One 2 One), but is
determined to fight hard.
TIW
Current market share none
Network coverage none
Sum paid #4.3bn
Spectrum allocation 35MHz
GPRS coverage starts data not available
This joint venture bid for and won the licence reserved for a new
player.
It is at the early stages of working out its strategy for using its
spectrum allocation, which, at 35MHz, is the largest of the five. It is
expecting to invest #3bn to build the network from scratch, and is seeking
partners for the construction process.
*Source: Oftel (31/3/00)
How fast is the next generation?
The first generation of mobile phone networks were analogue - good for
nothing except having a conversation. The current systems are digital -
which is the second generation. Networks have a bandwidth allowing
handsets to receive 9.6 kilobytes of information/second. Some handsets are
data-compatible, allowing text messaging and access to internet content
through the WAP protocol.
GPRS, the so-called 2.5G, is likely to allow transfer of around 50
kilobytes/second.
The third generation - 3G phones and networks - simply involves more
bandwidth.
This could be as much as 384 kilobytes/second, but most people expect more
modest speeds of around 144 kilobytes/second to be typical at launch.
A typical MP3 music file is three megabytes, so, for example, it would
only take about 20 seconds to download a track to your phone.
At this speed, users will have considerable extra functionality in their
phones - live video for example, only requires 64 kilobytes/second. Many
people access the internet at a speed of 28.8 kilobytes/second using a
modem and a PC at home -3G phones could be five times faster than
that.
While this is technically possible, the problem could be network
capacity.
Each ”cell” (small area served by a transmitter) will have two carriers
each allowing, say 144 kilobytes/second of data transfer. That is probably
only enough capacity for three simultaneous video calls at a time,
although different network operators say different things. Orange, for
example, says video might only involve 28.4 kilobytes/second.
The capacity problem could be offset to some extent by a high cost to
consumers, which is likely to be proportionate to the amount of bandwidth
used. For example, if a 9.6 kilobyte/second calls costs 10p per minute,
video might cost #1.50 per minute at 144 kilobytes/second.
Despite the high charges that the auction prices mandate, Telecom analysts
estimate 3G phones will reach 22 per cent of the population by 2010.